David Kimura PRO
Joined 7/18/2015
Drifting Ruby Owner
David Kimura PRO said about 1 year ago :
Honestly, this looks like it was generated by a LLM. There are several decisions here like 
data-overlay-target="content"
Which could be 
this.contentTarget

What does the view look like?

David Kimura PRO said about 1 year ago on Ruby on Rails Development with Microsoft Windows 10 :
Respectfully, There is no need for a Xeon processor for web development in nearly every use case. There are many more affordable as well as portable options. For server hosting, a Xeon may make sense, but not for development workflows.

David Kimura PRO said about 1 year ago on ActiveJob Callbacks :
Yea, ActiveJob Exceptions Callbacks would perhaps be a better name, but that's getting a bit wordy for the episode title :)

David Kimura PRO said about 1 year ago :
The note about the overlay target was separate from the streaming.

I would put the turbo_stream_from in the code where it made sense. If the modal is being dynamically rendered (so once you close it or another modal pops up and replaces this chat one) then it would make sense to have the turbo_stream_from inside of the modal so it will be disposed when the modal is replaced or destroyed.

If you want to receive the streams even when the modal is closed or not preset (updating some other parts of the page like an unread message count) then it should exist outside of the modal code.

Hope this makes sense.

David Kimura PRO said about 1 year ago on Dockerizing Rails :
Ooo... That can be a tough one to solve. On the host machine, are you able to access the GemInABox and the npm proxy? 

You could run the network_mode: "host" which should bypass the Docker networking and the host's DNS/VPN settings/Proxy config would be available to the container. It also means that you lose the isolation of the containers which means that even without the port forwarding, the application (port 3000) would automatically be exposed on the host machine. 

For development, this could be a viable tradeoff as long as you understand the caveats. 

Are you using Docker for deploying the application in production? If so, what steps are you using to install the NPM packages and gems from the private gem server? If you want to keep the security isolation, you may need to do something similar.

I went through this kind of hassle in the past where we had multiple dockerfiles and the docker compose commands included one of the "setup" Docker compose files which included stuff like the private certs and accesses to the private repositories. This was used as a build step so the later steps could just copy the installed packages and didn't need to retain the certs and access. It was annoying and often lead to confusions. 

I think if I were dealing with something like this today, I may set up something like Tailscale for the developers where their machine could access those resources, or use a build step to do a temporary tailscale connection to install those gems.