For sure! AI assisted development can be very powerful. It should not, at least in its current states, replace anyone's development jobs. Even scaling back teams due to AI is a mistake unless those teams were already overpopulated from an over-hiring effort. And to your point,... this would not be vibe coding. If we critique and modify the code that is being generated, regardless of how much code it is, we're outside the scope of vibe coding and now in assisted coding. How much assistance the agent provides is a different discussion too. If we rely on the agent to do most/all of the coding and we simply just tweak it, we're going to be heading down a bad path of messy code that will be more expensive to maintain down the road. I don't think that there's a magic percentage of how much generated code is acceptable either. Nor, the implications of where did it get the knowledge to generate that code and who truly owns it.